Revocable Land Trusts For Ownership of Real
Estate – Part 1
By Tim Bruxvoort
he history of using trusts to own property dates back
hundreds of years. It has even been said that trusts began in the days of
ancient Rome. While their benefits are well understood by wealthy people…very
few people outside this elite group know how and why to use them.
Before we get too far perhaps I
should clarify a few terms. What does the term “trust” mean in the context of
real estate? A trust is defined as real estate held by one party…the
Trustee…for the benefit of another…the Beneficiary. A Trustee can be
an individual, such as a family member or friend, or a bank, attorney, or other
financial institution.
Most of us have heard about some
wealthy individual passing away and leaving his or her wealth to heirs via a
trust. This is similar to the type of trust I’m talking about. But specifically,
I’m talking about a Revocable Land Trust. This type of trust is solely about
real estate and not other type of assets such as stocks, bonds, and other
financial assets (except for mortgages and other real estate related financial
assets).
What Is A
Revocable Land Trust?
A Revocable Land Trust consists of simple paperwork
that allows a Trustee to hold legal title to real estate in the land trust. But
the Beneficiary still retains all of the rights and conveniences of ownership.
The Trustee only has one responsibility besides
holding the title. That is to do what the Beneficiary instructs and to transfer
the property of the trust when the trust ends.
The Beneficiary of
a Revocable Land Trust has complete control over the property. The
Beneficiary manages the property, which includes collecting and distributing
income, insuring the property, or directing the lease or sale of the property.
The Beneficiary can assign these responsibilities to the Trustee. In fact, the
particular trust agreement I use to set up a trust gives the Trustee these
abilities.
What Are The
Benefits of Land Trusts?
There are many benefits of a Revocable Land Trust.
The primary benefits real estate investors are concerned about are itemized
below:
1.
Avoidance of Title Seasoning Issues
Title seasoning has nothing to
do with salt or spices. Now that we are clear on that…title seasoning is a
mortgage lender term that simply means that the owner of a property is on public
records as owning the property for a specified period of time. Before a property
is sold to a buyer, most lenders want to see the previous owner of a property on
public records for at least 6 to 12 months.
Why do lenders care about how long a property is
owned? It all stems from recent problems with what has been labeled "Property
Flipping Scams."
These scams were done in mostly low-income
neighborhoods by unscrupulous investors. These investors bought cheap, run-down
properties and did quick, shoddy repairs on them. Usually the investor was in
collaboration with an appraiser and a mortgage broker. The appraiser came in and
gave a bogus appraisal and the mortgage broker got the loan…, which was always
for more than the property was actually worth.
The result was an unsophisticated buyer who
purchased a home at a greatly inflated price. Of course, the buyer could never
resell the house at that price so it ends in foreclosure if the buyer needs to
sell anytime soon.
The favorite tool used by these
ruthless investors was double-closings or simultaneous closings. This is where
the investor goes on title only minutes before title is transferred to the
end-buyer. So now many lenders are wary any time they see a simultaneous closing
or anything that smells of “flipping” a property.
There is another issue some
lenders have with simultaneous closings. That is they don’t want to give a loan
to your end-buyer because you aren’t even on the title yet. The property is
still listed under the name of the party you’re buying it from.
Having to own a property for 12
months can be a problem for we real estate investors when we are looking for
fast cash. If you already have this problem there are mortgage brokers who can
get around title seasoning issues and simultaneous closings. But it’s always
better to not have a problem in the first place.
Using a land trust may be the best way to solve
issues with title seasoning or simultaneous closings. For example, if you
buy a property from Jack Jones, then the name of your trust would be “Jones
Family Trust.” It depends on the situation, but one way this could look for a
seller is like this:
1.
Jack deeds the property to the Jones Family Trust with you as Trustee.
2.
You and Jack set up the trust agreement with Jack as the beneficiary.
3.
Jack assigns his beneficial interest of the trust to you or your company
(could be held in escrow)
4.
You record the new deed that shows the property in a trust.
Now the lender will see the transfer of title
to the trust. But since the beneficial interest is not recorded…they just assume
that the property is still owned by Jack Jones. And Jack has owned the property
for years.
Then your buyer gets a loan and
you provide the closing company with the Assignment of Beneficial Interest that
shows your (or your company’s) ownership of the property. Title seasoning issue
solved!
2.
Avoidance of Liens and Judgments Attaching To The Property
When you buy a property using Lease Option or
Subject To techniques, one problem you can run into is that liens or judgments
against the seller could attach to the property if the title is not in your
name.
With liens or
judgments attached to the property you wouldn’t be able to sell it to your
buyer!
Perhaps the main reason for
using a trust when purchasing properties “subject to” existing financing or with
lease options is that they protect the property from judgments and liens against
the seller. If a judgment or lien is entered against the seller, it will not
automatically attach to the property. Title to the property is no longer in the
seller’s name, but in the name of the trust instead.
3.
Asset Protection
Even if you own property free
and clear…or you used your own credit to buy it…putting the property into a
trust can be your first line of asset protection. A trust creates a privacy
barrier by keeping your property ownership from becoming public knowledge. By
getting your name off the title, it makes it more difficult for anyone to search
public records for properties you own.
Not using trusts is like walking around with a
sign on your back that says, “Sue me…I own lots of real estate”.
There are no requirements to
register a trust as you must with a corporation or LLC so it provides better
privacy than even these entities do. The beneficial interest of the trust is not
recorded anywhere. So the only people who will even know about your beneficial
interest in the trust are yourself, the Trustee, and perhaps an attorney if you
use one.
If you have rental properties
you should seriously consider placing all of your properties in separate trusts.
“Professional” tenants make a career out of suing landlords. Without trusts,
these tenants…or their lawyers…can easily look in public records to find out you
own a bunch of properties. Then you just may very well be their next “employer”
who provides them a big, fat paycheck in the form of a judgment.
A trust is not a bulletproof asset protection
strategy...which is why it should be used along with other asset protection such
as corporations, LLCs, or limited partnerships.
If you are sued and a judgment
is entered against you, even with a property in a trust a creditor can force you
to list all assets you own. Of course, the creditor would have to be smart
enough to ask you to list any beneficial interests you hold in trust as
well...if not, you just wouldn’t mention them. After all, you don’t own the
property…the trust does.
But if the creditor does find
out you have beneficial interest, you could be forced to sign it over to him or
her. In this way, a judgment against you can still attach to all your real
estate. This would prohibit you from selling any real estate without first
paying the judgment in full. Some attorneys can help you set up more complex
asset protection strategies to counter this.
4.
Due on Sale Avoidance
When you buy properties “subject to” the existing
financing, or even with lease options, you need to be aware of the “due-on-sale”
clause in almost all mortgages these days. The due-on-sale clause says that if a
property ownership is transferred in any way whatsoever, the lender has the
right to call the entire loan amount due. A typical due on sale clause looks
like this:
“If all or any part of the Property or any
Interest in the Property is sold or transferred without Lender’s prior written
consent, Lender may require immediate payment in full of all sums secured by
this Security Instrument.”
With foreclosures near record highs, it’s not like
lenders are out there really looking to call loans due when the payments are
being made on time. In fact, they would be absolutely crazy to call a performing
loan due because it would hurt their ability to make new loans.
One thing that could cause lenders to start
enforcing the due on sale clause is if interest rates greatly increase.
But unless that happens, why would a lender spend money in legal fees to
foreclose a mortgage and put another non-performing loan on its books?
Regardless, land
trusts can be used as a way to avoid waving a property transfer in a lender’s
face.
The Garn-St. Germain Act of 1982 protects a
property transferred into a land trust from the due on sale clause. The clause
in this Act says “a transfer into an inter-vivos [between the living] trust in
which the borrower is and remains a beneficiary and which does not relate to a
transfer of rights of occupancy in the property” is allowable.
Remember, even though the Assignment of Beneficial
Interest form transfers the beneficial interest to you, this document isn’t
public knowledge so the lender doesn’t know about it.
But you might ask: “Isn’t it illegal to violate the
due on sale clause? No! To be "illegal," you must be in violation of a code,
statute, or criminal law. There is no federal or state law that makes it a crime
to violate a due-on-sale clause. The clause just gives the lender an additional
right to call a loan due if they want.
Real estate investors are buying
properties “subject to” everyday with very few due on sale clause problems. Real
estate guru Ron Legrand has bought over 1500 houses and only had a lender
threaten him with the due on sale clause one time. Even then they backed off
when they realized it didn’t make sense to pursue.
There are only three ways a
lender will find out if the interest in real estate has been transferred.
1.
Through a change in name on the deed. But lenders won’t really find out
this way since they don’t have people in the Register of Deeds office searching
records all day.
2.
The name on the check for payment changes. Although, most lenders have
processing centers that know nothing about due on sale clauses and they don’t
care where the check comes from anyway.
3.
The name of the beneficiary on the hazard insurance policy changes. This
is the most likely way for a lender to find out a transfer has occurred.
But remember the Garn-St.
Germain Act allows a property owner to transfer title into a trust. Lenders are
used to seeing the insurance change from the owner’s name to the name of the
trust. Property owners transfer title into trusts for estate-planning devices
every day.
A lot of investors who purchase
properties subject to existing financing don’t even bother to set up trusts. And
the majority of them don’t have problems with the due on sale clause. Remember,
even if you only lease option properties you’re still violating the due on sale
clause. Recording a Memorandum of Option to protect your interests in the
property could in theory trigger the clause.
So while triggering a due on sale clause is
extremely unlikely, why not implement a strategy that greatly reduces the chance
of a problem plus has the other benefits we talked about?
In Part Two of this article, I will talk about how
to set up a Land Trust.
Tim Bruxvoort
http://www.commercialrealestateinsider.com
http://www.homebasedriches.com
http://www.remedyhomebuyers.com
Note:
This article is not intended as legal advice and
should not be considered as such. You should always confirm all matters with a
knowledgeable attorney.
Go to Part 1
Go to Part 2
Home